Skip to content

feat(google-vertex): add new models [bot]#892

Open
harshiv-26 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
bot/add-google-vertex-20260430-000441
Open

feat(google-vertex): add new models [bot]#892
harshiv-26 wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
bot/add-google-vertex-20260430-000441

Conversation

@harshiv-26
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@harshiv-26 harshiv-26 commented Apr 30, 2026

Auto-generated by model-addition-agent for provider google-vertex.


Note

Medium Risk
Primarily data/config additions, but introducing a model with mode: unknown could trip schema/validation or downstream routing if mode values are assumed to be known.

Overview
Adds two new Google Vertex model definition YAMLs: an internal internal-test-google/multi-region-test-model entry (with mode: unknown) and a new moonshotai/kimi-k2-6 chat model marked preview with documented source links and an explicit note that pricing/limits are not available in official Vertex docs.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 2cd26d8. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit d84e669. Configure here.

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
mode: unknown
model: internal-test-google/multi-region-test-model
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Internal test model added to production registry

Medium Severity

The auto-generated bot added internal-test-google/multi-region-test-model to the model registry. This is the only internal-test model across all providers, and the name strongly suggests it's a Google-internal test model not intended for end users. Including it in the production model catalog may expose a non-functional or unstable endpoint and confuse users.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit d84e669. Configure here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test-models

@harshiv-26
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Gateway test results

  • Total: 0
  • Passed: 0
  • Failed: 0
  • Validation failed: 0
  • Errored: 0
  • Skipped: 0
  • Success rate: 0.0%
Provider Model Scenarios

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant