docs: follow-up typo fixes for matrix packages and number/uint64/ctor

[Planeshifter]

Description

Follow-up fixes for commits merged to develop between 2026-06-25 19:40 UTC and 2026-06-26 08:21 UTC (SHA range a8789cce9..ba7afec2a, 22 commits reviewed).

This pull request:

• Fixes a copy-paste typo and twelve propagated documentation issues introduced by the new ndarray/matrix/{float64,float32,complex64,complex128,int32} packages, the ndarray/matrix/ctor README expansion, and the number/uint64/ctor toPrimitive addition.

Fixes by package

number/uint64/ctor

• Fix @returns description for the lo accessor in lib/node_modules/@stdlib/number/uint64/ctor/docs/types/index.d.ts — copy-pasted from hi, causing it to read "high word" instead of "low word" (a8789cc).

ndarray/matrix/ctor

• Fix stray space in compound adjective array- like → array-like in ndarray/matrix/ctor/README.md (7ff0456).

ndarray/matrix/complex128

• Correct the @example for the (buffer, byteOffset, M, N, options?) overload in ndarray/matrix/complex128/docs/types/index.d.ts — copy-pasted from the shape-based overload and erroneously passed [ 2, 1 ] instead of the scalar arguments 2, 1 (6e71938).
• Fix stray space in compound adjective array- like → array-like in ndarray/matrix/complex128/README.md (56ffe96).

ndarray/matrix/complex64

• Correct the @example for the (buffer, byteOffset, M, N, options?) overload in ndarray/matrix/complex64/docs/types/index.d.ts — copy-pasted from the shape-based overload and erroneously passed [ 2, 1 ] instead of the scalar arguments 2, 1 (117fe75).
• Fix stray space in compound adjective array- like → array-like in ndarray/matrix/complex64/README.md (56ffe96).

ndarray/matrix/float32

• Correct the @example for the (buffer, byteOffset, M, N, options?) overload in ndarray/matrix/float32/docs/types/index.d.ts — copy-pasted from the shape-based overload and erroneously passed [ 2, 1 ] instead of the scalar arguments 2, 1 (d93e3df).
• Fix stray space in compound adjective array- like → array-like in ndarray/matrix/float32/README.md (56ffe96).

ndarray/matrix/float64

• Correct the @example for the (buffer, byteOffset, M, N, options?) overload in ndarray/matrix/float64/docs/types/index.d.ts — copy-pasted from the shape-based overload and erroneously passed [ 2, 1 ] instead of the scalar arguments 2, 1 (af1484d).
• Fix stray space in compound adjective array- like → array-like in ndarray/matrix/float64/README.md (56ffe96).

ndarray/matrix/int32

• Correct the @example for the (buffer, byteOffset, M, N, options?) overload in ndarray/matrix/int32/docs/types/index.d.ts — copy-pasted from the shape-based overload and erroneously passed [ 2, 1 ] instead of the scalar arguments 2, 1 (03d3cb0).
• Fix stray space in compound adjective array- like → array-like in ndarray/matrix/int32/README.md (56ffe96).

Related Issues

None.

Questions

No.

Other

Validation

Audited 22 commits merged to develop in the last 24 hours via four parallel reviewers (two style-compliance, two correctness-focused bug scans). Each finding was independently re-verified by reading the modified files before inclusion.

Checked:

• stdlib code style guide compliance (docs/style-guides/{javascript,c,text})
• Obvious correctness bugs in the introduced code
• Documentation that contradicts the implementation it documents
• Typos in identifiers, user-visible strings, and docs

Deliberately excluded (would have required interpretation or out-of-window changes):

• Subjective preferences and "could be cleaner" suggestions
• Concerns whose validation needed touching code outside the 24-hour window
• One reviewer-flagged "alphabetical-ordering violation" in ndarray/matrix/lib/index.js: dropped after verifying that stdlib's established convention for typed namespaces (see ndarray/vector/lib/index.js) orders type-size digits numerically (Complex64 before Complex128, vector between Complex128 and Float32), so the current order is correct.

Checklist

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

This PR was generated by a scheduled review routine running on Claude Code. The routine enumerated commits merged to develop in the last 24 hours, dispatched four parallel reviewer agents to surface issues, filtered out single-agent findings that could not be independently re-verified by re-reading the diff, and applied only the validated typo fixes listed above. Each fix was re-read after application to confirm it matched the proposed change exactly; no code outside the diff window was touched. Left in draft for human audit.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
ndarray/matrix/complex128	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}0/0$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
ndarray/matrix/complex64	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}0/0$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
ndarray/matrix/ctor	$\\color{green}1296/1296$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}255/255$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}7/7$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}1296/1296$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
ndarray/matrix/float32	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}0/0$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
ndarray/matrix/float64	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}0/0$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
ndarray/matrix/int32	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}2/2$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}0/0$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}253/253$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
number/uint64/ctor	$\\color{red}585/644$ $\\color{green}+90.84\\%$	$\\color{red}49/52$ $\\color{green}+94.23\\%$	$\\color{red}9/11$ $\\color{green}+81.82\\%$	$\\color{red}585/644$ $\\color{green}+90.84\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.