IBX-11776: Fixed invalidating files when the content version didn't change#80
Open
Sztig wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
IBX-11776: Fixed invalidating files when the content version didn't change#80Sztig wants to merge 2 commits into
Sztig wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…ted but the content version has not changed
6eb6655 to
4960e6e
Compare
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Description:
This bug happens when we have a draft and we are making changes in this draft (in our case - the image).
Since the files are served without tagging by default, regular tag invalidation that happens when publishing content is not enough to refresh the changes.
In our logic, since it is still a draft, the content version didn't change ergo the file is presented when published without any changes. Without this fix to see the changes we would need to republish the content once again.
I have added a subscriber
BinaryFileHttpCachePurgeSubscriberthat explicitly purges the URI for ezimage, ezbinaryfile, and ezmedia when publishing the content.