docs: revise third-party license tables in docs#329
Conversation
I had to bump git-bot-feedback so that its metadata uses a SPDX identifier (instead of a custom LICENSE file). I also removed the hard-coded table about OpenSSL now that we don't use it anymore.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe PR updates the ChangesDependency and License Metadata Updates
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #329 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.94% 90.94%
=======================================
Files 22 22
Lines 3368 3368
=======================================
Hits 3063 3063
Misses 305 305 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
I had to bump git-bot-feedback so that its metadata uses a SPDX identifier (instead of a LICENSE file which is not a custom license).
I also removed the hard-coded table about OpenSSL now that we don't use it anymore.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Documentation