Make it work for async functions#80
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Updated the wrapper function
jgchris
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2026
jgchris
left a comment
jgchris
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will the returned function from the decorator stay async now? Before it was making it appear like a synchronous function that just happened to return a coroutine. It would be really nice if it had the right metadata to be an async function.
47thomasj
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm getting some asyncio errors from auditor in its runs. The cause seems to be bug reporter calling asyncio.run when that's how auditor is ran already. This pr should fix that by just awaiting the async function directly if it's already in an async thread.