Skip to content

feat(zero-trust-assessment): add unmanaged device browser isolation gates#2755

Closed
zeroknowledge0x wants to merge 4 commits into
UnitOneAI:mainfrom
zeroknowledge0x:feat/unmanaged-device-isolation-gates
Closed

feat(zero-trust-assessment): add unmanaged device browser isolation gates#2755
zeroknowledge0x wants to merge 4 commits into
UnitOneAI:mainfrom
zeroknowledge0x:feat/unmanaged-device-isolation-gates

Conversation

@zeroknowledge0x

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Addresses #2743 — adds unmanaged device browser isolation gates to the zero-trust-assessment skill.

Changes

Devices pillar maturity table (BYOD/Unmanaged row):

  • Advanced: "Risk-based access with browser isolation for unmanaged"
  • Optimal: "Continuous posture assessment + verified isolation gates for all device types"

New findings (ZT-DEV-11 through ZT-DEV-15):

  • ZT-DEV-11: Unmanaged/BYOD devices access sensitive apps without browser isolation
  • ZT-DEV-12: Browser isolation deployed but without data movement controls (clipboard, download, print, local storage)
  • ZT-DEV-13: No negative tests验证 isolation effectiveness (screenshot bypass, copy/paste, mobile browser differences)
  • ZT-DEV-14: Isolated browser session lacks automatic cleanup on device state change or session termination
  • ZT-DEV-15: Unmanaged devices can open direct file URLs outside isolated browser context

New section: Browser Isolation Readiness Assessment
7 readiness factors covering isolation mode, data movement controls, session cleanup, file URL handling, mobile browser coverage, negative testing, and app sensitivity mapping.

Why

The original skill assessed BYOD at a high level ("risk-based access") but didn't verify how unmanaged device access is constrained. Browser isolation is the primary control for BYOD scenarios — without verified isolation gates (clipboard/download/print blocking, session cleanup, negative testing), "browser isolation enabled" is not enough evidence of effective data movement controls.

Closes #2743

…nce gates

Addresses review feedback from UnitOneAI#2724:

- Add Suppression Risk Tiers (Safe/Moderate/Risky/Dangerous) to distinguish
  evidence-backed, time-bounded, owner-approved suppressions from blanket
  indefinite exclusions
- Add Safe Suppression Requirements with mandatory fields: named owner,
  expiry date, scope, evidence, and auto-reopen triggers
- Add Drift Evidence Gates (6 gates): suppression age, plugin update, asset
  exposure change, package change, compensating control status, quarterly review
- Add Suppression Inventory and Drift Gate Audit to Output Format sections
- Enforce critical distinction: compensated risk != confirmed false positive
- Update FP Validation Workflow disposition to require lifecycle compliance
- Update Prompt Injection Safety Notice with suppression lifecycle constraints
- Add pitfalls UnitOneAI#6 (indefinite suppressions) and UnitOneAI#7 (compensated risk as FP)

Closes UnitOneAI#2724
…cle model

- Remove duplicated 'Indefinite (no expiry)' and 'Compensated risk misclassified as FP' lines in output
- Suppression lifecycle model with risk tiers, drift gates, and evidence requirements
- Enforce FP vs compensated-risk disambiguation throughout
- Add drift evidence gates: plugin update, exposure change, package change, control removal
- Common pitfalls UnitOneAI#6 (indefinite suppressions) and UnitOneAI#7 (compensated-as-FP)

Closes UnitOneAI#2724
…ates

- Add browser isolation controls to BYOD/Unmanaged maturity row (Devices pillar)
- Add ZT-DEV-11 through ZT-DEV-15 findings for isolation gaps
- Add Browser Isolation Readiness Assessment section with 7 readiness factors

Addresses UnitOneAI#2743: unmanaged device access needs isolation gates to constrain
BYOD access and make it testable. Covers data movement controls (clipboard,
download, print, local storage), session cleanup, file URL handling, mobile
browser coverage, negative testing, and app sensitivity mapping.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the needs-approved-issue PR has no linked maintainer-approved issue label Jun 18, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the submission! 🙏 SecuritySkills is now issue-first: contributions need a linked issue that a maintainer has marked approved before a PR is opened.

Please open an issue describing the skill, wait for the approved label, then reopen this PR with Closes #<issue> in the description. The PR template lists everything we'll look for (including an independently runnable reproduction).

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Jun 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-approved-issue PR has no linked maintainer-approved issue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[REVIEW] zero-trust-assessment: add unmanaged device browser isolation gates

1 participant