⚡ Performance: Cache DateTimeFormatter allocations#51
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What:
Implemented a static caching mechanism using
ConcurrentHashMapinAwidgetProvider's companion object to reuseDateTimeFormatterinstances, replacing local, per-callDateTimeFormatter.ofPatterninstantiations. The cache automatically invalidates if the system locale changes.🎯 Why:
DateTimeFormatteris relatively expensive to instantiate despite being thread-safe. InsidebindCalendarEventsand other update cycles (which can be called frequently on the main or background threads during widget updates), these repeated allocations introduce unnecessary overhead.📊 Measured Improvement:
Benchmarking formatter creation before and after the optimization demonstrated a clear performance win:
PR created automatically by Jules for task 6209526747688497514 started by @LeanBitLab