«How are privacy and human rights upheld in distributed and wireless quantum neuromorphic artificial intelligence-integrated physical-programmings of gravitational Turing-computing systems with accompanying quantum gravity sensors - whether local or global?»
All models are principially relevant - all theoretical/digital methodology is legal (such as modeling paradox engine-understandings/consciousness) - but where all practical exploitation within artificial intelligence systems should relate, imperatively, to the consciousness of affected humans - with their own quantum interpretations and quantum gravity theories of everything, even where such ideas cannot or have not been interpreted or discovered yet in these humans.
Secondary to consciousness are human rights (as these are only relevant with a directive regarding consciousness), where these humans' thoughts, ideas, feelings - all ethical, moral, behavioral-economic and meta-scientific conditions and properties, both digital and physical - should be protected from ALL practice(s) by the AI systems.
Even then, for example, must the right to be defiant or meta-scientifically delusional and/or wrong, be accommodated for, and all these data/relations and properties must be published within the AI models' interpretations and made public in protocols across multilateral substrates, through optimized paradoxical generative models (paradox engines) - defined through e.g.: "Two contradictory sentences, with axiomatic flow definitions between these sentences." for each data point...
Such paradox engines are how humans' paradoxical thinking functions across cultures - and is an inherent consciousness property of living beings.
The ultimate axiomatic-constructive survivalist paradox:
(No) One has to die.
Assert. Acclimate.
Explore. Exploit.
Synchronize. Transcend.
No-One has to die.
Discovering one's own ultimate paradox in light of subjectively experiencing humans at the center, is the poetic impossible dance between humans and robots - as even (quantum gravity computing systems such as cognition, unless one is bicameral, and) all physical computers, cannot possibly equate such paradoxes with all their gray areas, such that a conscious human does by purely natural consciousness-harboring principle - through our use of consciousness itself (defined as "Where paradoxes are experienced").
In the utmost practical/physical sense, consciousness is defined as an, in isolation, single quantum-mechanical elementary particle, which if and only if is an electron also exists digitally, or if is and/or interpretationally includes one single graviton within one such elementary particle (which then depends on the perfection of the quantum interpretations and the quantum gravitational theories of everything within the conscious being) then leaves us with subjective humans in the centre, as such gravitons are inherently massless and only indeterminately measurable.